The Land and Soil Jurisdiction that we refer to as ‘Australia’ or Terra Australis more precisely, is not defined as ye would think. According to the Acts Interpretation Act of 1901; AUSTRALIA means the ‘Commonwealth of Australia and, when used in a geographical sense, includes Norfolk Island, the Territory of Christmas Island and the Territory of Cocos (Keeling) Islands’, but does not include any other external Territory. Please note that in legalese when the term ‘includes’ is used, it excludes that which it does not state. ‘Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius.’

We currently live on an occupied territory that is administered by a foreign government usurping the Land and Soil jurisdiction with their watery Admiralty jurisdiction, drowning us in a sea of contracts. The ‘Australian Government’ is a registered company called Comcover/Department of Finance and has an ABN: 61970 632 495. It is listed on the EDGAR US Securities and exchange commission website and has a company prospectus.

Wars stemming back to the 1800’s has meant that Aussies have inherited the debts of our forefathers. We have an extensive history of war, but the war of 1812 between the UK and the US still impacts us economically to this day. In 1814 the US and the UK signed the treaty of to end the war. The Lincoln administration debt in the 1860’s lead to the World Banks taking control over the US. This was the beginning of military occupation of the US which led to implementing marshal law under the rules of war.

The Great White Fleet sailed around the world and seized all dominions and territories belonging to the UK, Ireland including Commonwealth nations simply by flexing the military might with no resistance at all, the people were oblivious. From 1908 we were occupied under the rules of war and the Hague conventions of 1907, Hague IV war on land. Perhaps Queen Victoria knew that that this fate was looming over Australia and an opportunity existed to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia, giving the people the ownership of Commonwealth of Australia and the right to self-determination under the Imperial Tudor Crown. The 1901 constitution made it more difficult for the bankers to take the Commonwealth of Australia via the Crown’s debt.

In 1903 a Federal Red Ensign was warranted and gazette as our King’s Land Flag. This is our true flag and has not been changed to this day. The Blue Flag was issued to the Government and is only to be flown by Government or Government Agents, it is not the flag of it’s people. It is unlawful for the people (subjects) to fly this flag however if ye are a citizen it is because citizens belong to the Australian Government and Subjects do not.

The occupying force took over the court system and deceived the people into changing their allegiance to the occupier. The Occupier has a right under the rules of USUFRUCT to recover debt. All occupying military power is bound to all conventions and treaties and ‘Aussies’ became citizens of the administration, and became belligerent and disloyal to their country….Citizens place themselves into admiralty jurisdiction which comes under the rules of international law.

The Hague Conventions in the early 1900 was called because the World Banks were preparing to call in the loans they made to the Crown with military force. Hague IV, War on Land in 1907 gave the World Banks the right to use military force to seize and occupy the dominions and territories belonging to the UK, Ireland, including all the Commonwealth nations.

The first great war began in 1914 and as a consequence 62,000 ANZACS died on foreign shores defending the Imperial Realm. Australia paid a heavy price! In 1919 the heads of Government met at Versailles to restore prosperity and global disarmament by way of US President Woodrow Wilson’s fourteen Points of the Treaty of Versailles. The last point being the development of the League of Nations.

Billy Hughes, the Prime Minister of the Commonwealth of Australia petitioned King George V to represent Australia and his request was granted. Australia was ready and able to stand on its own as a sovereign nation and Kingdom and have a voice on the world arena. Billy Hughes spoke on behalf of our 62,000 ANZACS that were killed and 156,000 wounded or taken prisoner which was 42% of the male population between 18 and 24.

The Balfour Declaration of 1926 issued by the Imperial Conference stated; “autonomous Communities within the British Empire, equal in status, in no way subordinate one to another in any aspect of their domestic or external affairs, though united by a common allegiance to the Crown, and freely associated as members of the British Commonwealth of Nations.”

This had made an impact because in 1927 a foundation stone for the United Kingdom Of Australia was laid at the shrine of remembrance in Melbourne, sealing it in Law forever. The ANZAC Shrine anchors our imperial crown into sacred ground which is our true line of authority, Lest we forget.

King George V was also, styled, titled, with a coronation and crowned as King of Australia, separate to all his other styles and titles according to the Styles and Titles Act 1927. King George V, was very limited in what he could do considering he was under administration and was bound by international law. At the very least he ensured that our occupiers played by the rules in play, the treaties which form international law.

In 1931 the Commonwealth of Australia parliament was heavily influenced by the foreign occupation, the U.S. and the League of Nations which was later renamed the United Nations. School curriculum began to change and our history was rewritten.

In 1936 the people of all Commonwealth countries including the Kingdom of Australia were still subjects of their respective Imperial Crowns, however in 1948 the Citizenship Act changed everything. The Imperial Crown as opposed to the St Edwards Crown that symbolises the Vatican and Roman Law, and Roman Rule, and this is why Rome, through the United Nations has such a tight grip on the Commonwealth of and Kingdom of Australia.

The death of King George V made it easier for the occupying military to execute their will. King Edward VIII renounced the throne before his coronation and his brother King George VI took the throne. It is important to note the switch of the crowns and to know the difference between them. In 1936 the people of all Commonwealth countries including the Kingdom of Australia were still subjects of their respective Imperial Crowns, however in 1948 the Citizenship Act changed everything.

Australians went from being Commonwealth Subjects to Commonwealth Citizens on the Citizenship. Citizenship is a change of status in law and allegiance. As citizens are legally regarded as wards of the State, and makes ye state property as Citizens. Citizenship comes under Roman law and binds ye to Rome through Thy allegiance to the St Edwards Crown. A change of allegiance, under the rules of war, gives the occupying military the right to place the burdens of war directly on the belligerent or disloyal. Belligerent means that ye are at war and something that ye want to avoid. A citizen is defined as a member of a political community owing allegiance to the community and a Subject is defined as someone who owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by Sovereign laws. [Blacks Law Dictionary 11th Edition]

In 1953, Queen Elizabeth II became the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and her public coronation with the Imperial Tudor Crown and had a private ceremony where she was secretly crowned with the St Edwards Crown, which is a foreign Catholic Crown. She was never coronated in Melbourne on the Coronation Stone for the United Kingdom of Australia so was a foreign Queen, under a foreign crown with a foreign line of authority!

1973 was a big year, Gough Whitlam, signed ‘Australia’ over to the foreign: UNIDROIT Treaty of Rome, handing the Equitable Title of the mineral and energy wealth of Australia to a “foreign power”, head office Rome. This criminal act of treason, the number of lawyers in parliament that pledge their Oath to the foreign, Inner City of London, in order to hide the truth from the masses in pain sight!

UNIDROIT uses the ALL UPPER-CASE debased corrupt DOG-LATIN text of Babylon (Rome), being foreign to the common law English language. DOG-LATIN is used for foreign Roman (VATICAN) military accounts. (Military Dog Tags) The UNITED-STATES was signed over to UNIDROIT in 1964, just after Kennedy was shot dead and hidden from the masses. UNIDROIT is a foreign contractual system of governance as opposed to common law under the Commonwealth of Australia 1901 Constitution. The Australian Government’s Attorney Generals office pays $250k annually for membership to UNIDROIT.

Territorial land is different in that it is held in a custodial capacity and occupies a different jurisdiction — for example, Puerto Rico is a Territory of The United States, but politically, it is a British Commonwealth.

So all this while, the British Raj (Territorial Government) has been acting as a British Protectorate and establishing a Territory to rule over Australia the country, using the corporations Australia, Inc. and AUSTRALIA (INC.) to administer this Protectorate, and it has been established under the idea that the people failed to set up a new government after the end of the Commonwealth.

So, you have the country, Australia, which appears on old maps as Terra Australis (Latin version), and you have the Territorial Protectorate, also called Australia, and you have Australia, Inc. and AUSTRALIA (INC.) all in the mix.

Here we have the country known as The United States (National) and also as The United States of America (International) and we have the United States of America (British Territorial United States) and the United States (Papist Municipality) and the United States, Inc., and the United States of America, Inc., and the UNITED STATES and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, etc., etc.

Between the incorporated and unincorporated versions and all these similar names, it gets very confusing, but the bottom line is:

Australia, aka, Terra Australis, is a country.
Australia is also the name of the territory claimed and protected by Australia.
Australia, Inc. is a British Crown Corporation.
AUSTRALIA, INC. is a Roman Municipal Corporation.

The essential difference between “Australia” the country and “Australia” the territory, is the political status of the people who live in the country versus the political status of the persons inhabiting a separate part of the country, and to understand this, you must understand the British Caste System.

Men and women live in the country. They have Natural and Unalienable Rights. They are free men and women.
Humans, male and female, inhabit the territory.  They are indentured servants, public or otherwise.  They have timed tours of duty.
Corporations known as PERSONS inhabit municipal districts, parishes, etc. They are slaves, public or otherwise.

Thus, a territory is a denigration of a country and humans who inhabit territories are a denigration of man.

Corporate PERSONS represent a further denigration of political status. Municipal CORPORATIONS named after humans, are slaves, and so MARTIN L. FUZZBOTTLE is a denigration of the human Person named Martin L. Fuzzbottle, and this version of “Martin L. Fuzzbottle” is a denigration of the living man whose Given Name is Martin L. Fuzzbottle.

Example, Norfolk Island is a Territory of Australia; for the period of time that Norfolk Island is Subject to Australia (in the same sense as a “British Subject”) the men and women living and being born on Norfolk Island are considered to be “humans” and “Persons” with the same political status as indentured servants of members of the military during their Tours of Duty.  Like members of the military, these Persons have titles and ranks: Mister, Missus, Sergeant, Attorney, General, Doctor, The Honorable, Captain, Judge, and so on.  They are employees, paid or unpaid, of the Territorial Government.

So, what happens when an entire country, like Australia, is reduced to the level of being a territory without the knowledge or consent of the people living there?  A form of peonage is established, in which everyone living in Australia is deemed to be a “Person” — that is, merely a human male or female, equivalent to an indentured servant, known as a Citizen.  Their labor, land, and other assets are seized upon by the King or other Principal, and “income taxes” are imposed as a means to siphon off the value of the people’s labor for the King. They excuse this as a “condition of your employment” but of course, don’t necessarily bother to give you a paycheck.

Thus, it is a form of feudal serfdom arbitrarily imposed on the otherwise free people of Australia by a foreign power, in this case, the British Territorial Government.

Peonage has been outlawed worldwide since 1926 and in England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales, and most of the developed world, it has been outlawed for the better part of 200 years; however, they have skirted around this by pretending that this is “voluntary” and that you contractually agreed to this by filing tax reports — albeit, without the benefit of disclosure, just as they presume that you agreed to be dubbed a “human” based on unconscionable contracts imposed upon you when you were still a baby in your cradle.

Let’s take a look at this using their dictionary so that they expose what they are up to:

Legal definition of “country” — Black’s Law, Admiralty:

The portion of the earth’s surface occupied by an independent nation or people; or the inhabitants of such territory.   (Here we see that “country” refers to the geographical and physical portion of the Earth we live in, whereas “territory” is a political jurisdiction that is inhabited.)

Legal definition of “territory” — Black’s Law, Admiralty

A part of a country separated from the rest, and subject to a particular jurisdiction. (Here again, a territory is a political jurisdiction, meaning that it is inchoate — an incomplete jurisdiction separated from the actual land and soil and general jurisdiction of a country.)

Legal definition of “inhabitant” — Black’s Law, Admiralty

One who resides actually and permanently In a given place, and has his domicile there.

Legal definition of “resident” and “domicile” — Black’s Law, Admiralty

“Resident: one who has his residence in a place. “Resident” and “inhabitant” are distinguishable in meaning. The word “inhabitant” implies a more fixed and permanent abode than does “resident;” and a resident may not be entitled to all the privileges or subject to all the duties of an inhabitant.”

Additionally:  “Living or dwelling in a certain place permanently or for a considerable length of time. The place where a man makes his home, or where he dwells permanently or for an extended period of time. The difference between a residence and a domicile may not be capable of easy definition; but every one can see at least this distinction: A person domiciled in one state may, for temporary reasons, such as health, reside for one or more years in some other place deemed more favorable.”

Such as a British Merchant Sailor living for a period of years in America to perform as a Customs Agent.

In fact, in Land Law, a “resident” is equivalent to a “sojourner” — someone passing through and merely living in a place for an undetermined length of time. This is made clear in the American “Residence Act” which provides for members of foreign governments and their families to “reside” in this country while they are here providing essential services we agreed to receive under the various Federal Constitutions.

Now let’s look at “domicile” which sheds additional light:

“In international law, “domicile” means a residence at a particular place, accompanied with positive or presumptive proof of intending to continue there for an unlimited time. State v. Collector of Bordentown, 32 N. J. Law, 192.”Domicile” and “residence” are not synonymous. The domicile is the home, the fixed place of habitation; while residence is a transient place of dwelling. Bartlett v. New York. 5 Sandf. (X. Y.) 44.The domicile is the habitation fixed in any place villi an intention of always staying there, while simple residence is much more temporary in its character. New York v. Genet, 4 Ilun (N. Y.) 4S9.”

As you can see, these definitions are wobbly at best, and probably purposefully so, to more easily facilitate the imposition of denigrated political statuses on living people— and the accompanying Legal Presumptions of Feudalism, too.

These venal practices have been engaged in by the British Government and the British Crown Corporation and the Holy See under a cloak of secrecy, for the simple reason that these denigrations of political status are already recognized as being both illegal and unlawful, and have been recognized as such for a long time. Such manipulation and conversion of a man’s native political status is recognized as a capital crime under the Geneva Conventions and the Hague Conventions, both — hence the need to hide their activities in Australia, America, and elsewhere behind a “cloak of secrecy”.

The pretense that acceptance of these denigrations is voluntary, while also being unconscionable, is ludicrous, and amounts to a Highwayman claiming that, “She gave me her purse.”  — at the point of a rapier.

It is time for this nonsense to end and for the corporations and governments and the Principals responsible for these horrific practices and injustices to be brought to justice, also.  It is apparent that all three institutions– the British Government, the British Crown Corporation, and the Holy See — have gone rogue and have attempted to establish a form of Corporate Feudalism by which they hope to rule the entire world, effectively by denigrating the population of this planet in a manner favorable to themselves, via a surreptitious process of unlawfully converting entire countries into territories, leading to entire living populations of men and women being denigrated as “Humans” and “Persons” and then being further denigrated as PERSONS, meaning Municipal Corporations.

The denigration pattern is as follows:

Joseph Allen Palmer (Man) is denigrated to Joseph Allen Palmer (Territorial Person) and further denigrated to JOSEPH ALLEN PALMER (Municipal Corporation).  Australia (the Country) is denigrated to Australia (a Territory) and thence to AUSTRALIA (a Municipal Corporation).

All this venal wordplay is worth what it is written on and needs to be expunged.  Those who have promoted this fraud scheme beneficial to themselves need to be exposed for what they are and dealt with as criminals together with the bankers that have supported them in these activities. None of this could have been done without the complicity of the banks and certain bankers who have certainly known that what they were doing was both criminal and outrageous. Their excuse that living flesh was somehow magically converted into paper and that this gave them permission to securitize flesh is in the realm of lunacy.

Likewise, the members of the Bar Associations worldwide who have knowingly collaborated with and acted as the enforcers and implementers of this scheme against humanity must be severely dealt with.  They, if anyone, have known the basis upon which millions of false claims in commerce have been made, have known that they were involved in illegal confiscation and enforcing bills of attainder, have been aware of the noxious and logically insupportable British Caste System, and have known that there was no excuse for “conferring” any territorial status on other countries and establishing unnecessary “military protectorates” within their borders to expedite this scheme.

And as for the military, they may not have known that the foregoing monsters had unlawfully converted them into mercenary forces, but they have cause to know it now, and they are in fact responsible for taking appropriate action to remove these false and vacated authorities, or they shall be complicit themselves and subject to prosecution for treason against these countries and people, and crimes against humanity.

Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652

January 27th 2024